Does this mean that they have already sent it out to the When submitting a major revision, does it matter whether the revised manuscript or the response to reviewers appears first? Sorry about that. You must have received the The status of the manuscript says 'Reviewers Assigned' for about 24 days. "Editorial assessment of reviews" can mean that all reviewer send back their reviews and "Manuscript under editorial consideration" could mean that the editor hit the button "look at review". For the status of your submission to They havent decided yet. Thanks for the response! Things just always take much longer than we think they would. I think you have to patient young padawan:) But fingers crossed. Welcome to the new Tab View Submission form. In most cases, the decision is made in less than three months. In addition, content in this journal can be accessed through the dissemination of SharedIt links. Of course, one cannot be sure, but I think your paper stands a fair chance of being sent for peer review. Answer: The status "Under Editorial Consideration" for this journal is equivalent to the status "Manuscript submitted successfully" which shows up for most journals once the submission is complete. They also have a waiver program that supports authors unable to cover publication fees in these journals. Such inter-journal communications help expedite the publication process. Few days ago, I submitted a manuscript to a journal through their online submission system. WebEditor in Chief, Nature. (LogOut/ Update on the question. WebI submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses, Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the corresponding journal. Is it under review by the reviewers? [CDATA[> Or reviewers are not responding to the editor after the request to review the revised manuscript by the editor? What does the typical workflow of a journal look like? Authors often worry that papers posted on a preprint server would be disqualified from consideration at Nature Portfolio journals. //--> We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. Duress at instant speed in response to Counterspell. [CDATA[> (LogOut/ There are weekly meetings on which the editorial board (the paid by the journal) meet and check which manuscript to send to reviewers and select those reviewers.In my experience they are at the end of the week, because we usually get editorial decision friday or monday. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. In any case, there's nothing to do except wait and see. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); A paper may be rejected because of problems with the research on which it is based. What does it mean? SR: The different Nature Portfolio journals are editorially independent. Also, if it had to be negative outcome, it wouldnt take so Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - reddit PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. This means that authors of an accepted paper can choose to pay an author publication charge to make their paper free in perpetuity under an open license (CC-BY) to maximise reuse. [CDATA[> All Rights Reserved. EB: In addition, there is an ongoing trial called Guided Open Access through which a paper can be submitted and simultaneously considered for a number of Nature Portfolio journals. MC: If you are worried about potential bias, all Nature Portfolio journals offer the option for a mutually anonymous peer review, where the identities of both the referees and the authors are hidden from each other throughout the peer-review process. Thank you, [CDATA[// >